EQA Avocats Forms Strategic Alliance with Belgravia Law
We are pleased to announce the formation of a strategic partnership between EQA AVOCATS and BELGRAVIA LAW, an independent London-based law firm.
BELGRAVIA LAW is recognized not only for its strategic approach and responsiveness but also for its expertise in cross-border litigation, international arbitration, and M&A.
This partnership spans the jurisdictions of Paris, London, and New York, enhancing EQA Avocats’ ability to handle complex cases involving US and UK jurisdictions. It enables our clients to meet EQA Avocats teams in London and New York.
This collaboration reflects our continued commitment to supporting clients in their cross-border challenges by offering tailor-made solutions that combine technical expertise, responsiveness, and a deep understanding of their economic environment.
BELGRAVIA LAW stands out for its ability to manage high-stakes, sensitive cases, particularly regarding international sanctions, transnational litigation, and proceedings involving both UK and US authorities. With a legal culture rooted in common law standards and a strong international outlook, BELGRAVIA LAW shares our commitment to excellence, rigor and openness.
“This alliance reflects our ambition to provide clients with global support aligned with their economic and geographic needs. Allowing EQA Avocats to extend its activites to London and New York. said Étienne ÉPRON, Managing Partner of EQA AVOCATS.
Represented by Benjamin WELLS, BELGRAVIA LAW relies on a team of experienced lawyers regularly involved in high-level international proceedings. The firm provides bespoke support to clients—including companies, executives, family offices, and institutions—in both litigation and strategic advisory work.
We are delighted about this next step in EQA AVOCATS’ international development, built on shared values: technical excellence, understanding of economic realities, and client-focused commitment.
Clients can now reach EQA AVOCATS lawyers in the UK at 2 Eaton Gate, London SW1W 9BJ, and in the US at 295 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10017. BELGRAVIA LAW teams are now also available in France at 56 Avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.
Latest news
EU General Court Rules for the First Time on Damages Claims After the Annulment of Sanctions
The General Court of the European Union (EU) recently delivered a judgment in a case concerning the non-contractual liability of the Union (GC, Pumpyanskiy v Council, T-369/24), brought by a citizen holding Russian and Swiss nationality following the adoption of restrictive measures against him—the individual concerned being listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No… Continue reading EU General Court Rules for the First Time on Damages Claims After the Annulment of Sanctions
A Judicial Storm Looms: How the Central Bank Can Challenge the Confiscation of Reserves in the EU
In one week, European Union leaders could approve proposals by the European Commission to “pledge as collateral” Russia’s immobilized sovereign reserves for a “reparations loan” to Ukraine. The vast majority of the Russian Central Bank’s (RCB) assets are located in Belgium (Euroclear), whose Prime Minister has repeatedly warned that transferring these assets for Ukraine’s benefit… Continue reading A Judicial Storm Looms: How the Central Bank Can Challenge the Confiscation of Reserves in the EU
Harmonisation and Clarification of the EU Sanctions Regime: Insertion of the Concepts of “Ownership” and “Control”
Pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, natural or legal persons designated in Annex I to that Regulation are subject to the freezing of all funds and economic resources belonging to them. It is also… Continue reading Harmonisation and Clarification of the EU Sanctions Regime: Insertion of the Concepts of “Ownership” and “Control”
Political communication on tax matters, first lesson: Present as exceptional what is meant to become structural.
Nearly fifteen years ago, the 2012 Finance Act introduced an apparently temporary tax, the Exceptional Contribution on High Incomes (CEHR), conceived “in a context of reducing public deficits and restoring our public finances,” intended “to request an exceptional effort from the wealthiest taxpayers.”¹

